\(
\def\cuberoot#1{\sqrt[3]{#1}}
\def\fourthroot#1{\sqrt[4]{#1}}
\def\abspartial#1#2#3#4{\left|\,{\partial(#1,#2)\over\partial(#3,#4)}\,\right|}
\def\absdeltal#1#2#3#4{\left|\,{\d(#1,#2)\over\d(#3,#4)}\,\right|}
\def\dispop#1#2{\disfrac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}}
\def\definedas{\equiv}
\def\bb{{\bf b}}
\def\bB{{\bf B}}
\def\bsigma{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}
\def\bx{{\bf x}}
\def\bu{{\bf u}}
\def\Re{{\rm Re\hskip1pt}}
\def\Reals{{\mathbb R\hskip1pt}}
\def\Integers{{\mathbb Z\hskip1pt}}
\def\Im{{\rm Im\hskip1pt}}
\def\P{\mbox{P}}
\def\half{{\textstyle{1\over 2}}}
\def\third{{\textstyle{1\over3}}}
\def\fourth{{\textstyle{1\over 4}}}
\def\fifth{{\scriptstyle{1\over 5}}}
\def\sixth{{\textstyle{1\over 6}}}
\def\oA{\rlap{$A$}\kern2pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}I}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obA{\rlap{$A$}\kern2pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}I}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obX{\rlap{$X$}\kern2pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}I}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obY{\rlap{$Y$}\kern2pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}I}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obZ{\rlap{$Z$}\kern2pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}I}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obc{\rlap{$c$}\kern2pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}I}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obd{\rlap{$d$}\kern2pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}I}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obk{\rlap{$k$}\kern2pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}I}}\kern.5pt}
\def\oba{\rlap{$a$}\kern2pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}I}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obb{\rlap{$b$}\kern1pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}t}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obw{\rlap{$w$}\kern1pt\overline{\phantom{\dis{}t}}\kern.5pt}
\def\obz{\overline{z}}\kern.5pt}
\newcommand{\bx}{\boldsymbol{x}}
\newcommand{\by}{\boldsymbol{y}}
\newcommand{\br}{\boldsymbol{r}}
\renewcommand{\bk}{\boldsymbol{k}}
\def\cuberoot#1{\sqrt[3]{#1}}
\def\fourthroot#1{\sqrt[4]{#1}}
\def\fifthroot#1{\sqrt[5]{#1}}
\def\eighthroot#1{\sqrt[8]{#1}}
\def\twelfthroot#1{\sqrt[12]{#1}}
\def\dis{\displaystyle}
%\def\definedas{\equiv}
\def\bq{{\bf q}}
\def\bp{{\bf p}}
\def\abs#1{\left|\,#1\,\right|}
\def\disfrac#1#2{{\displaystyle #1\over\displaystyle #2}}
\def\select#1{ \langle\, #1 \,\rangle }
\def\autoselect#1{ \left\langle\, #1 \,\right\rangle }
\def\bigselect#1{ \big\langle\, #1 \,\big\rangle }
\renewcommand{\ba}{\boldsymbol{a}}
\renewcommand{\bb}{\boldsymbol{b}}
\newcommand{\bc}{\boldsymbol{c}}
\newcommand{\bh}{\boldsymbol{h}}
\newcommand{\bA}{\boldsymbol{A}}
\newcommand{\bB}{\boldsymbol{B}}
\newcommand{\bC}{\boldsymbol{C}}
\newcommand{\definedas}{\equiv}
\newcommand{\half}{\frac{1}{2}}
%\newcommand{\slfrac}[2]{\raisebox{0.5pt}{$\scriptstyle{}^{#1}\!/\!_{#2}$}}
\def\slfrac#1#2{\raise.8ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle#1$}\!/\!\lower.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle#2$}}
\newcommand{\bsigma}{\boldsymbol \sigma}
\newcommand{\abs}[1]{\left|\,#1\,\right|}
\newcommand{\Rectangle}{\sqsubset\!\sqsupset}
\newcommand{\rectangle}{{%
\ooalign{$\sqsubset\mkern3mu$\cr$\mkern3mu\sqsupset$\cr}%
% How to do fractions: for 1/2 use this in place: $\raise{0.8pt}{\scriptstyle{}^{1}\!/\!_{2}}$
% for n/m use this in place: $\raise{0.8pt}{\scriptstyle{}^{n}\!/\!_{m}}$
}}
\)
Principle Mathematical Induction on Ordinal Numbers
Patrick Reany
18 December 2025
Note: This chat I had with Copilot is likely edited for relevance and brevity. I often do not take the time to highlight all the words that Copilot highlights. Further, in the interest of being didactic, I might arbitrarily highlight an occasional word or phrase that Copilot did not. (Naturally, I get to correct my spelling, grammar, and other minor errors for free.)
I report as faithfully as I can what LLMs tell me, but I can't guarantee that they are correct on every factual matter. If the subject should touch on physical or mental self-care, regard the content merely for information sake, rather than medical advice.
Patrick:
I have been told that to use the principle of mathematical induction on an indexed proposition (over the natural numbers) P, one must start the process by first proving that P(0) is true. But doesn't this treat the naturals cardinally rather than ordinally? In other words, don't we really need to prove first only a base case, say for a lowest natural number b, and then proceed from there. The successor function that takes us from $n$ to $n+1$ is an ordinal function, not a cardinal function. But then, of course, the resulting proof will be good only for natural numbers greater than or equal to $b$. [Or to put it simply, there is nothing special about 0; all we need is a lowest case to get the process started.]
Copilot:
You've put your finger on a subtle but important distinction, Patrick. Let's disentangle the cardinal vs. ordinal aspects of induction:
1. Induction as an ordinal principle
- The principle of induction is fundamentally about the well‑ordering of the naturals: every nonempty subset has a least element.
- The induction step uses the successor function: if \(P(n)\) holds, then \(P(n+1)\) holds. This is an ordinal construction --- it's about moving along the chain of successors.
- Nothing in the principle itself requires that the chain start at 0. It only requires a least element to anchor the process.
2. Why textbooks often start at 0
- In modern set‑theoretic foundations (Peano arithmetic, ZFC), the naturals are defined beginning with \(0\) as the least element.
- So the "base case" is usually stated as \(P(0)\).
- But this is a convention, not a logical necessity. If you define the naturals starting at 1 (as in some traditions), then the base case is \(P(1)\).
3. Generalized induction principle
Formally, the induction principle can be stated as:
> If \(b\) is the least natural number in your indexing scheme, and
> (i) \(P(b)\) holds, and
> (ii) for all \(n \geq b\), \(P(n) \implies P(n+1)\),
> then \(P(n)\) holds for all \(n \geq b\).
This formulation makes clear that 0 is not special --- it's just the conventional choice of base.
4. Cardinal vs. ordinal perspective
- Cardinal view: "0" is the cardinality of the empty set, so starting at 0 emphasizes counting size.
- Ordinal view: Induction is about the order type of the naturals, not their cardinality. The successor function is ordinal in nature.
- Your observation is right: induction is an ordinal principle. The fact that we often phrase it with \(0\) reflects the cardinal definition of naturals in set theory, but the logical machinery works with any least element.
5. Practical consequence
- If you want to prove a statement only for numbers \(\geq b\), you can start induction at \(b\).
- This is common in number theory: e.g., proving a property for all integers \(\geq 2\).
- The induction principle adapts seamlessly: you prove the base case at \(b\), then the step from \(n\) to \(n+1\).
So you're exactly right: induction is ordinal in spirit, and the base case can be any chosen least element. The emphasis on \(0\) is conventional, not essential.
Would you like me to show you how this plays out in Peano axioms versus set‑theoretic definitions of naturals? That contrast makes very clear why some traditions privilege 0, while others (like Euclid or many number theorists) start at 1.
Afterword: